Sunday, November 8, 2015
How To Debate Science With Pro-Vaxxers
I made a comment on an article:
The healthcare system is clear they don't understand how vaccines work. We do understand an injection with a ‘dead’ piece of virus and an adjuvant like mercury or aluminum creates an autoimmune response. An organism won't have a reaction without the neurotoxin involved because the virus is dead. However, not every human reacts the same way to a neurotoxin being injected into his or her veins.
A provax respondent takes the bait:
Your first line is nonsense. How vaccines work is very well understood. To deny that is to deny a huge amount of science going back a couple of hundred years and more. In fact, how vaccines work is very well understood and very well established. Stop telling stories.
My rebuttal:
How to Debate Vaccination Culpability with Pro-Vaxxers
On January 7th, 2014, nine years after the fact, in the case of Karsen Steele Waters, the United States Court of Federal Claims made it's final decision.
The undersigned finds that there is not a preponderance of the evidence showing that Karsen’s injuries were caused or significantly aggravated by his February 19, 2005 vaccinations. Although Karsen’s vaccinations may have caused a low grade fever or otherwise triggered his first seizure on February 20, 2005, neither that initial seizure nor his vaccinations caused or significantly aggravated his Dravet syndrome and resulting neurological complications. Rather, his SCN1A genetic mutation is the sole cause of his injuries. For that reason, the undersigned finds by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent has provided an alternative cause of Karsen’s injuries, and, therefore, petitioners are not entitled to compensation.
This is how I debated a provaxxer in the comments of a recent pro-vaccination article. The pro-vaxxer responds to the above:
What do you want me to say, Albert?
That the courts made the wrong decision? Because it sounds to me like they made
the right one. Dravet Syndrome is a genetic disorder.
My repsonse:
So your saying the health practitioner
doesn't need to check for genetic weaknesses in people before they give them
vaccines that might hurt them? If the vaccine gives someone diabetes then
that would be the injured persons problem because why? Because they have
a pancreas? Perhaps there is no culpability for manufacturers that make
toy parts which wedge in children's mouths and choke them to death. Let
the buyer beware! That's a famous real estate saying. Let's apply
that to vaccines to. Let the vaccinated beware! 15 hours after your
receive a vaccine if you turn epileptic, that's your problem.
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Mercury 101 Workshop
Do you get achey from the weather? You may be mercury
toxic.
Here is a quote from Richard Swiderski's "Calomel In America." In 1851 Dr Wooster Beach describes the swollen tongue, the lesions in the mouth of the habitual calomel consumer, so imbued with mercury that he had become a 'living barometer' responsive to all changes in the weather, 'great pain making the only difference.'
We are learning about mercury toxicity, and making game plans on how to change the future of medicine the world over.
Mercury 101 explains in easy to understand details drawn from historical facts, the uses and abuses of mercury, and how they continue to this day.
http:// www.mercuryfreekids.org/ mercury-101/
Did you know that mercury as a healthcare treatment spread just as fast as newborn diseases, during the middle ages? You will see that the roots of the modern day healthcare industry, and related U.S. government policies, are still dictated by mercury interests. Learn how mercury distribution, and redistribution in the human body is one of the most pressing medical issues of our day.
After you experience Mercury 101, you will agree that healthcare institutions and doctors alike must test the mercury toxicity of every patient. There is NO safe level of mercury in a healthy organism, even though official health organizations and those affiliated with them tell us otherwise.
Here is a quote from Richard Swiderski's "Calomel In America." In 1851 Dr Wooster Beach describes the swollen tongue, the lesions in the mouth of the habitual calomel consumer, so imbued with mercury that he had become a 'living barometer' responsive to all changes in the weather, 'great pain making the only difference.'
We are learning about mercury toxicity, and making game plans on how to change the future of medicine the world over.
Mercury 101 explains in easy to understand details drawn from historical facts, the uses and abuses of mercury, and how they continue to this day.
http://
Did you know that mercury as a healthcare treatment spread just as fast as newborn diseases, during the middle ages? You will see that the roots of the modern day healthcare industry, and related U.S. government policies, are still dictated by mercury interests. Learn how mercury distribution, and redistribution in the human body is one of the most pressing medical issues of our day.
After you experience Mercury 101, you will agree that healthcare institutions and doctors alike must test the mercury toxicity of every patient. There is NO safe level of mercury in a healthy organism, even though official health organizations and those affiliated with them tell us otherwise.
Sunday, November 1, 2015
Free Flu Shots, Potlaches, and Used Car Salesmen or The First One Is On The House!
When have you ever known someone to give you something for free? Perhaps in a gifting environment like Burning Man you might get something for free, but Burning Man is based on principles like radical-self reliance. Burning Man is the closest I have ever come to experiencing a full potlach, but the potlach was outlawed by the white establishment. How can capitalism survive when faced with a system that gives everything away for free.
Potlatching was made illegal in Canada in 1884 in an amendment to the Indian Act
and the United States in the late 19th century, largely at the urging
of missionaries and government agents who considered it "a worse than
useless custom" that was seen as wasteful, unproductive, and contrary to
'civilized values' of accumulation.
It's kind of like when a friend asks you, "Can you do me a big favor?" And it turns out she wants you to hold her purse while she goes into the store. Not so big is it? But then your friend asks, "Can you do me a little favor?" And it turns out to be something enormous, like drive the getaway car during a bank robbery. So what would the warning be if the first one is on the house, "It's FREE!"
The warning is, you may be in the pocket of the dealer for a long time to come once you start down that road.
It's kind of like when a friend asks you, "Can you do me a big favor?" And it turns out she wants you to hold her purse while she goes into the store. Not so big is it? But then your friend asks, "Can you do me a little favor?" And it turns out to be something enormous, like drive the getaway car during a bank robbery. So what would the warning be if the first one is on the house, "It's FREE!"
The warning is, you may be in the pocket of the dealer for a long time to come once you start down that road.
Please come out on
Friday November 6th, you will learn a great deal about the history of mercury poisoning in
modern day healthcare, and how you can safely chelate mercury from the body.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)